Author

Hugo Lepetit

DOUBLE-CLIP TRACTION IS SUPERIOR TO THE POCKET CREATION METHOD FOR COLONIC ESD: A RANDOMIZED STUDY IN AN EX VIVO MODEL
DOUBLE-CLIP TRACTION IS SUPERIOR TO THE POCKET CREATION METHOD FOR COLONIC ESD: A RANDOMIZED STUDY IN AN EX VIVO MODEL

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

RISK FACTORS OF STENT OBSTRUCTION AFTER EUS GUIDED CHOLEDOCODUODENOSTOMY WITH LUMEN APPOSING METAL STENT: A LARGE PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 118 CASES
RISK FACTORS OF STENT OBSTRUCTION AFTER EUS GUIDED CHOLEDOCODUODENOSTOMY WITH LUMEN APPOSING METAL STENT: A LARGE PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 118 CASES

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

MUSCULAR RETRACTION SIGN (MRS): A PREDICTIVE FACTOR OF NON-CURATIVE COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD)? RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN AN EXPERT CENTER
MUSCULAR RETRACTION SIGN (MRS): A PREDICTIVE FACTOR OF NON-CURATIVE COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD)? RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN AN EXPERT CENTER

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

SMSH SCORE (SIZE, MANEUVERABILITY, SITE, HISTORY) A NEW SCORE TO PREDICT EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS OF COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD)
SMSH SCORE (SIZE, MANEUVERABILITY, SITE, HISTORY) A NEW SCORE TO PREDICT EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS OF COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD)

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

RISK OF DELAYED BLEEDING AFTER COLORECTAL ESD IN A LARGE PROSPECTIVE WESTERN COHORT: THE LIMOGES BLEEDING SCORE
RISK OF DELAYED BLEEDING AFTER COLORECTAL ESD IN A LARGE PROSPECTIVE WESTERN COHORT: THE LIMOGES BLEEDING SCORE

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

CONECCT CLASSIFICATION: THE BEST DAILY WAY TO ELIMINATE SUBMUCOSAL CARCINOMA IN LARGE SUPERFICIAL LESIONS
CONECCT CLASSIFICATION: THE BEST DAILY WAY TO ELIMINATE SUBMUCOSAL CARCINOMA IN LARGE SUPERFICIAL LESIONS

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

ESD CURRICULUM IN FRANCE : A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEARNING CURVES IN 3 FRENCH CENTERS WITH DIFFERENT TRAINING METHODS
ESD CURRICULUM IN FRANCE : A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LEARNING CURVES IN 3 FRENCH CENTERS WITH DIFFERENT TRAINING METHODS

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OR PIECEMEAL ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR LARGE SUPERFICIAL COLORECTAL LESIONS: COST-EFFECTIVENESS IN THE ERA OF SYSTEMATICCOUNTERTRACTION
ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OR PIECEMEAL ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION FOR LARGE SUPERFICIAL COLORECTAL LESIONS: COST-EFFECTIVENESS IN THE ERA OF SYSTEMATICCOUNTERTRACTION

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOMES BETWEEN THE ESD OF LARGE COLONIC AND RECTAL LESIONS? FRENCH MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE COHORT OF 3901 PROCEDURES (FECCO- NCT04592003)
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOMES BETWEEN THE ESD OF LARGE COLONIC AND RECTAL LESIONS? FRENCH MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE COHORT OF 3901 PROCEDURES (FECCO- NCT04592003)

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

OUTCOMES AFTER PERFORATION FOLLOWING COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS: RESULTS FROM A LARGE PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRIC COHORT
OUTCOMES AFTER PERFORATION FOLLOWING COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS: RESULTS FROM A LARGE PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRIC COHORT

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

IMPACT OF ANNUAL CASE VOLUME ON COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION PROCEDURAL OUTCOMES AND SAFETY IN A LARGE MULTICENTRIC PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
IMPACT OF ANNUAL CASE VOLUME ON COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION PROCEDURAL OUTCOMES AND SAFETY IN A LARGE MULTICENTRIC PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Hugo Lepetit  et al.

Item 1 - 11 / 11
1